I wonder what happens if someone on the call says "I do not consent to being recorded by AI". Probably nothing.

There's a consent clickthrough when you join the meeting. If you don't consent, you don't join the meeting.

At minute 14, Trevor, the manager of u/copychapple was notified that one of his directs is resisting AI adoption.

Perhaps speak a bit about how to weaponize smallpox or cook meth at home and Claude will self terminate the connection on their end.

Why on earth would any third party continue to use Anthropic’s offerings to manage their AI needs? They clearly are going to cannibalize any profitable integrator.

This is something I wonder about as well. If this is their strategy then using anthropic to help you write software, directly as a feature of your product, or their office software is just giving away trade secrets/road maps/etc to a competitor.

Specifically I wonder how Google feels leasing TPUs to Anthropic while they're clearly developing enterprise office software to directly compete with Google.

Duopoly is the only answer, and it’s why we need antitrust back in the U.S.

I think it's also an argument that no private labs should've developed the underlying models. It's been wreckless, based on theft of work, and now creates a power imbalance we haven't seen in a long time if ever.

If we could do it all over again we should've made it a public private development where the cutting edge research and models were developed as a public good and let private actors develop it for business and other offerings. Things would undoubtedly moved slower, but I think that would have been a benefit as well.

Seems like there’s plenty of competition idk

Because they have the smartest models?

How long before we have a meeting with multiple Claudes wearing different hats?

Will external contacts join calls with their own Claudes?

Are Claudes going to switch to a non speech audio protocol when humans leave the channel?

Are they going to communicate with ultrasound when humans are present?

It'll be like bringing a translator. Your AIs have your own project context loaded. Except, they are really probably more knowledgeable than the humans who haven't read any of the relevant documents for the meeting yet.

At some point some human needs to understand and decide at least something all these meetings are about.

But we are quickly moving away from that point.

Please get me off this planet

Idk man this just feels like moving towards the sci-fi future I’ve always dreamed of

Like of course the ai is in on your calls and you can just ask it to do stuff… anything less wouldn’t be sci-fi cool

Your dream is to be stuck on a Zoom call with an agent telling you “you’re absolutely right”?

I suppose perhaps I’m being unfair. Maybe your dream is for you and all other workers being replaced by an AI entirely. I’m sure no unforeseen negative consequences could arise from such an outcome.

oh don't be so negative. the dream is probably something like TARS from Interstellar

I guess you can just ask Claude about any idea you have and it should absolutely agree with it. Please don't tell your em this trick.

Everyone knows your rug pull kind of failed by missing the IPO target 40% short. Just stop it with these half baked product releases no one cares about and fix Claude Code.

Come on in ! Transfer all your data from your current walled corporate garden, to ours ! This corporate cage has AI !

I mean... haven't most of us built this already?

Wiring an LLM into elevenlabs and having it sit amidst humans sending each other voice memos is great. I don't need a closed-source solution for that.

We do it here:

https://magenta.cryptograss.live/