I think when it comes to making machines smarter than humans, Executive Order 14434 represents an admirable effort by this administration to meet the machines halfway.
nostrademons [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I wish we could talk more about Natural Stupidity, which is the flip side of Artificial Intelligence, the seeming desire of humans to show that they are dumber than a machine.
sobiolite [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Less meeting them halfway and more blasting past them at Mach 10 and continuing to accelerate.
chrismorgan [3 hidden]5 mins ago
> Beginning with the October 19, 2026 collection, instrument wording was updated due to Executive Order 14434.
But hang on, surely “(formerly referred to as Artificial Intelligence or AI)” fails the provision in §1¶3 “not acknowledge the usage of ‘Artificial Intelligence’ and ‘AI’ in any applicable setting” (admittedly not reiterated in §2 or §3)?
totetsu [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Its showing up in all the NIST stuff now too. Gave me quite mid-meeting snort when I saw that.
jshier [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Yet another thing to make illegal in '29. We're going to have to reform the whole notion of the executive.
tdeck [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Or we could just talk a lot about a return to "norms" without reforming anything.
fhdkweig [3 hidden]5 mins ago
It is sad knowing we are spending all this money on monuments that will just be spent all over again when we remove them in 2 years. And yes, these word/name changes are meant to be a monument, a tangible mark on history.
andsoitis [3 hidden]5 mins ago
> a chart produced by Apollo Global Management in September 2025
We’re using a year old chart to have a pulse on trends in a very fast moving market place?
simonw [3 hidden]5 mins ago
No, we are using that chart as inspiration for a new October 2026 chart with the latest numbers from the same underlying data source as the 2025 one:
I only use Super Intelligence (SI) in Lake America, in the Gulf of America, and maybe soon in the Trump Ocean. In there it's a Golden Age like nobody's ever seen before.
Everywhere else I just use AI.
NoidFonsense [3 hidden]5 mins ago
[flagged]
ourmandave [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Well now you're just quoting Space Force doctrine.
(Esp. the second part.)
boston_clone [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Off-topic, but why does your username have an incel slur (e.g., "foid") in it?
idle_zealot [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Reviewing post history, it's very clearly tongue-in-cheek. The user probably spends time in spaces that shit on incels and the like and is adopting the name ironically.
NoidFonsense [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Would you prefer if it was NoidMonsense?
fhdkweig [3 hidden]5 mins ago
It doesn't say "foid", it says "noid". If you were a child of the 1980s, you'd know The Noid.
But hang on, surely “(formerly referred to as Artificial Intelligence or AI)” fails the provision in §1¶3 “not acknowledge the usage of ‘Artificial Intelligence’ and ‘AI’ in any applicable setting” (admittedly not reiterated in §2 or §3)?
We’re using a year old chart to have a pulse on trends in a very fast moving market place?
https://static.simonwillison.net/static/2026-11-01/5821A414-...
(Esp. the second part.)
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=noid+domino%27s+pizza&ia=we...