I live very close to LAX, and we have hundreds of Waymos in our area. At first i was a little weary, and kinda weirded out by all of them.
They have become completely normal, and cause WAY fewer traffic incidents than human drivers. They are very predictable, and will always let you pull in front of them when changing lanes (unlike a lot of other LA drivers).
I have seen a few incidents where they seem 'stuck', and it was a bit annoying and kind of funny, but again, it does not happen nearly as often as for human drivers.
I also like taking them. It is nice to just get in and relax and not have to talk to anyone or worry about who is going to pick you up. You can control the temperature and music from your phone, you can drop the pin exactly where you want to be dropped off and picked up, and the ride is smooth and comfortable.
We can debate all the knock on effects of Waymos, but the user experience is pretty great.
arjie [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Surprisingly low hype for a company running perhaps the most advanced consumer-interactive robots. I’m quite fond of these machines and will periodically rescue them when someone has misused them (door not closed, most commonly). Hope they do well. Very good road participants.
cyanregiment [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Your brown nosing is not going to save you in the AI apocalypse.
Lord Waymo (His Graciousness, Blessed Be His Name) will deal with you like the rest of us
hmokiguess [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Missed opportunity to say "Open to Y'all"
BugsJustFindMe [3 hidden]5 mins ago
"Open to All Y'all"
raddan [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Isn't there supposed to be a liaison in there? "Open to Alls Y'all"
I doubt the geofence exclusion is because of the demographics of those areas and not the demand for autonomous vehicles in those areas, although I don't doubt the latter is a result of the former.
smt88 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I doubt this is correct. “It’s expensive to be poor” — a lot of people who can’t afford cars (or have bad credit) end up Ubering to/from work every day
quxbar [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Here in Austin, I'm stuck calling an uber and hoping I get a Waymo. When does that deal expire?
Is that seriously the demonym? Terrible. Try harder, Dallasites.
ndm000 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Having grown up in Dallas, I usually just say "Texan" and call it a day.
dgunay [3 hidden]5 mins ago
It sounds too much like "parasite" for me to be comfortable using it. I'm assuming some random person made it up. It's okay to just say "people of/from <place>", guys.
raddan [3 hidden]5 mins ago
But then you lose extra important information from words like "masshole."
adrianmonk [3 hidden]5 mins ago
What's your better suggestion? Dallasonian? Dallaser? Dallasan?
Also, do you have the same issue with the demonyms Manhattanite or Seattleite?
gumby271 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Dallmatians
chasd00 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
better than "cityofhate" which is what we're called most of the time.
triceratops [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Understandable, I'd also hate to live in Dallas /s
seizethecheese [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Texas -> Texan
Kansas - Kansan
Honduras -> Honduran
It should be Dallan?
mchusma [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I thought it was a typo, or strange url at first.
bijowo1676 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I like North Texans
gryfft [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Dallasians?
Dallasers?
Dallaslets?
Dallards?
CalRobert [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Dalwegians?
JacobAsmuth [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Dallonians
dyauspitr [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Dallamites, Dallsatians
Cider9986 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
It does seem necessary to have cameras inside driverless cars but I don't want to if Google is running the show. Your biometrics will probably be stored for "enforcing Google's policies" at a minimum [1].
And then a Waymo dropped teenagers off at the police? I don't care if that was a human, I don't want no snitch car service [2].
looks like Bishop Arts -> Fair Park -> White Rock -> NW Hwy -> Hampton/Inwood, with a weird section jutting out toward Irving along 114
so, no suburbs, only enclaves
PcChip [3 hidden]5 mins ago
our group sees them all the time while skating the katy trail and through downtown dallas
rawgabbit [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Thanks
Sheeny96 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Why are the cars so big? Wouldn't it make sense to have a bunch of much smaller, single person vehicles?
porphyra [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Tesla Cybercab has about three or four times the efficiency and like a fifth of the price by having smaller, two person vehicles. Indeed, the vast majority of trips are taken by single people and it's ridiculous to have a giant machine for them. It would also be okay to have a handful of larger, Model Y-sized vehicles for the multi-person trips.
To actually answer your question: Part of the reason why the Waymo cars are so big is because they got a deal on buying all the Jaguar I-Pace vehicles, which checked several boxes:
* Electric vehicles and hybrids are preferable for self driving cars as they have robust electrical power for the sensors and compute
* Larger minivans or SUVs are preferable for both development work and early scaling up where you can't afford to have both smaller and larger vehicles
* The I-Pace wasn't selling well so they managed to snag the whole production batch
* Though Jaguar isn't exactly known for their great reliability and electrical systems, the I-Pace, manufactured by Magna Steyr, is actually decent
The first two reasons are why the Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid, the only hybrid minivan sold in the US, was so popular for early self driving car efforts (including with Waymo) in the 2010s.
That said, Waymo's Ojai is somewhat more space efficient than the older I-Pace. They also have the Ioniq 5 coming.
cortesoft [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Why would it make more sense? It isn't like a car half the size would cost half as much, but it would severely limit the capacity. Now, you can get a waymo for 1-4 people, but if some (or all) were single occupant, you would be limited.
Being smaller does not help that much much in cost per mile, but has a big cost for functionality.
jwpapi [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I’m thinking that since 2015. Like BMW C1 just with doors on the side and a bit more security. This would approx allow 3-4x as many travellers on a given route compared to traditional cars.
grim_io [3 hidden]5 mins ago
A C1 with more security, meaning more material and air between you and a potential high-speed obstacle, is called a car and is sized like one.
smt88 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
SFC costs don’t scale linearly with volume or number of seats.
The cameras, LIDAR, and sensors are all fixed costs. You need them on even a single-person car. And they’re extremely costly.
arccy [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Americans are fat, they don't fit.
elianaive [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Keeps on being rolled out in red states while being delayed in blue states, quite unfortunate.
runako [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Divide this differently:
- states where the major cities commonly have snow for > 3 months
- states where the major cities commonly have snow for < 1 month
Inclement weather is likely the differentiator. Blue state California gets Waymo in its biggest cities, which handily do not get much snow. The other Waymo cities are all below the Mason-Dixon Line.
xnx [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Blocked even from testing in NYC. Blocked from DC and Boston. Unfortunately this does have more to do with bad government than bad weather.
warkdarrior [3 hidden]5 mins ago
They tried to roll out in New York City, but the city did not approve.
They have been fully open here in Los Angeles for almost two years now.
Zigurd [3 hidden]5 mins ago
It's easier to roll out in places where it seldom snows.
xnx [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Definitely true, but snow affecting driving conditions is becoming pretty rare in cities like Chicago.
km3r [3 hidden]5 mins ago
The anti-science slopulism of the far left is infecting blue states. Hopefully the liberal left can fight back to prevent the party being taken over like maga did to Republicans.
wwalexander [3 hidden]5 mins ago
What “anti-science slopulism” are you referring to? And what does corporate rollout strategy have to do with science?
xnx [3 hidden]5 mins ago
History of being anti-nuclear. Now against "AI" and self driving cars because they like trains.
dmitrygr [3 hidden]5 mins ago
"Maybe it's something you've got that they haven't got." - Owen Kellogg
It’s an extremely consistent experience, and you can sit in the front seat (something I like personally). With Uber and taxi services, you never know what kind of driver or ride you’re going to get.
ooopsss [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Uber is at least 1000x better than traditionally taxi, without any rating system.
sbuttgereit [3 hidden]5 mins ago
They use to be (along with Lyft). But it's been a very long time since that was clearly true.
In reality I think you can get better experiences than a taxi with a rideshare service (which they really aren't for a very long time), but it's very hit or miss.
So less consistently bad as a taxi service... but far from consistently good.
giancarlostoro [3 hidden]5 mins ago
The real test is, can these self-driving cars drive I-4 without getting into any sort of wreck?
I love Waymo. The only problem I have with it is that it further siphons wages from local economies into Silicon Valley, beyond what Uber/Lyft already did.
Geezus_42 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Dallas drivers are bad enough already...
ape4 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Anyone with a credit card
ventana [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Debit card works just fine with Waymo, just like with Lyft and Uber.
wilg [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I'm sure you can imagine why it might be unnecessarily complicated for a Waymo to take cash.
1over137 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
And presumably their app?, which requires either an Apple or Google account.
They have become completely normal, and cause WAY fewer traffic incidents than human drivers. They are very predictable, and will always let you pull in front of them when changing lanes (unlike a lot of other LA drivers).
I have seen a few incidents where they seem 'stuck', and it was a bit annoying and kind of funny, but again, it does not happen nearly as often as for human drivers.
I also like taking them. It is nice to just get in and relax and not have to talk to anyone or worry about who is going to pick you up. You can control the temperature and music from your phone, you can drop the pin exactly where you want to be dropped off and picked up, and the ride is smooth and comfortable.
We can debate all the knock on effects of Waymos, but the user experience is pretty great.
Lord Waymo (His Graciousness, Blessed Be His Name) will deal with you like the rest of us
Hmm. Maybe in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris,_Texas?
Also, do you have the same issue with the demonyms Manhattanite or Seattleite?
It should be Dallan?
Dallards?
And then a Waymo dropped teenagers off at the police? I don't care if that was a human, I don't want no snitch car service [2].
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49027861
https://www.404media.co/waymo-called-police-on-teens-san-mat...
Does that include the suburbs?
so, no suburbs, only enclaves
To actually answer your question: Part of the reason why the Waymo cars are so big is because they got a deal on buying all the Jaguar I-Pace vehicles, which checked several boxes:
* Electric vehicles and hybrids are preferable for self driving cars as they have robust electrical power for the sensors and compute
* Larger minivans or SUVs are preferable for both development work and early scaling up where you can't afford to have both smaller and larger vehicles
* The I-Pace wasn't selling well so they managed to snag the whole production batch
* Though Jaguar isn't exactly known for their great reliability and electrical systems, the I-Pace, manufactured by Magna Steyr, is actually decent
The first two reasons are why the Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid, the only hybrid minivan sold in the US, was so popular for early self driving car efforts (including with Waymo) in the 2010s.
That said, Waymo's Ojai is somewhat more space efficient than the older I-Pace. They also have the Ioniq 5 coming.
Being smaller does not help that much much in cost per mile, but has a big cost for functionality.
The cameras, LIDAR, and sensors are all fixed costs. You need them on even a single-person car. And they’re extremely costly.
- states where the major cities commonly have snow for > 3 months
- states where the major cities commonly have snow for < 1 month
Inclement weather is likely the differentiator. Blue state California gets Waymo in its biggest cities, which handily do not get much snow. The other Waymo cities are all below the Mason-Dixon Line.
https://www.twu.org/twu-tech-newsletter-waymo-no-mo-in-nyc-f...
People hate human drivers more than they hate the idea of AI drivers
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/04/business/uber-sexual-assa...
In reality I think you can get better experiences than a taxi with a rideshare service (which they really aren't for a very long time), but it's very hit or miss.
So less consistently bad as a taxi service... but far from consistently good.
https://www.worldatlas.com/places/the-most-dangerous-highway...