The Era of the Gamecube, Xbox, and PS2 will forever be the best in terms of consumer value and choice and commitment to quality, followed by the Xbox360 Ps3 gen....Its been boiling the frog since end of PS4 and on, but I got out of the water by the PS5...xbox was boiled long ago and were the first to turn up the temp
codemog [3 hidden]5 mins ago
The deal was they took everything from you… but at least you could buy electronics for cheap!
Now they don’t even let you have that.
inigyou [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Yeah, they've been explaining away inflation for decades by averaging housing with electronics. Yes your rent has tripled, but your TV is also 3 times as big and your gamebox has 1000 times the CPU so really, things have only gotten 2% more expensive, says the CPI calculation.
Now the politicians don't even have that excuse. I suppose they'll have to add AI tokens to CPI. Used to cost $1000 each, now $0.000002 each, average inflation is 2%.
Except they don't even have that because the recent FOMC meeting pretty much admitted inflation is 4% and they don't feel like doing anything to reduce it, but they're definitely committed to reducing it, they swear.
ActionHank [3 hidden]5 mins ago
It’s because of the idiocy of p&l tracking. The hardware, store, and games all need to be independently profitable.
Once they are, they all need to be more and more profitable.
Finally when it’s no longer profitable fire half the people and strip it for parts.
They’re already dead, they just don’t know it yet.
thegrim33 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Sounds like an opportunity then for you to create a competing company that functions the way you feel it should function. If that's what people value, you'll take all the business since you're the only one offering it.
darth_avocado [3 hidden]5 mins ago
> Sounds like an opportunity then for you to create a competing company that functions the way you feel it should function
Sure, if one has millions and millions in capital. Because why would an investor put a money in my company that works the way it “should” according to me if it produces lower profits as compared to my competitors?
lotsofpulp [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Because buyers choose to spend less money.
inigyou [3 hidden]5 mins ago
There are reasons people don't start businesses. Besides all the regulations, there's the constant struggle to pay rent.
EA-3167 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
What people value is subject to marketing and long-term manipulation, not to mention a poverty of competition.
sterlind [3 hidden]5 mins ago
bizarrely self-destructive behavior from XBox. they've been shooting themselves in the foot for years; apparently they've decided to exchange the gun for a flamethrower in hopes of cauterizing the stump.
poisonborz [3 hidden]5 mins ago
With all the other Xbox layoffs, shutdowns, price increases, rumors of pulling titles from Steam, what do they still expect from this brand?
datakan [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Nothing. That’s why they gave it to a young woman with no achievements whatsoever in gaming and no reputation to build off of. Her job is to kill it in a way Satya can save face on so they can finish their push to everything in the cloud.
mulderc [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Curious that you focus so much on her gender.
CamJN [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I don’t pretend to know GP’s motives for putting it that way, but if I was going to put on my evil hat and kill off a gaming company/division I’d also put a woman in the hot seat. Not because I think women don’t understand gaming, they do; nor that I think women can’t run successful companies, they do; but because a large chunk of the gaming market is openly misogynistic and would root for the failure outcome I was orchestrating. Hell I’d even throw in some kind of golden parachute deal because that would enflame the trolls even more. People are easy to manipulate, and that’s quite possibly what’s happening here.
baal80spam [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I didn't get the impression OP focused on the gender. Is it forbidden to mention a gender if it's female?
Seems to me the one focusing on the gender is you.
speak_plainly [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I think the point is that if it's irrelevant, why mention it?
sssilver [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Would you have responded similarly if the OP wrote:
> That’s why they gave it to a young man with no achievements whatsoever in gaming and no reputation to build off of
toomuchtodo [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Valve’s gain.
mpfh [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I don’t blame them because I don’t know all the variables involved. Neither does the media reporting and we don’t know what a company of their size is going through with prices going up and suppliers being unwilling to sell parts needed to manufacture these things.
I bought a used Xbox one a few years back. I’m not a heavy gamer anymore so I usually buy the previous generation or even two generations ago hardware, get the games I want from eBay and I’m good. And I was looking forward to getting a Series X, but at this point it looks unlikely unless the brand completely tanks and they’re selling them off to get rid of inventory. Otherwise, my Xbox one is going to be worth more in the future than what I paid, and I don’t want that situation for anyone.
bluescrn [3 hidden]5 mins ago
At this point, it’s the ExBox :(
GiorgioG [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Xbox is in complete disarray and is imploding. I haven’t owned a PlayStation in decades. If my son’s Xbox Series X (the worst naming ever) suddenly dies, we’ll either switch to PlayStation or build a PC.
wronglebowski [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I think that’s the really important implied question right now. Mostly everyone already has some form of device to play games on. What happens when they start to die off?
darth_avocado [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Xbox is in complete disarray because none of the people in charge seem like people who have played a single video game ever.
goldenarm [3 hidden]5 mins ago
PS5 prices went up 35% in the past 2 years, and PC RAM went 5x. This is a global problem
binarin [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Isn't playstation going download only way in a year or so, with no physical disks at all?
2III7 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
The majority of gamers don't care. PC has been digital only for decades.
rustcleaner [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I'm sure it applies to Xbox too, but I priced out today's PS to the PS1 and it closely follows the inflation rate that M2 has undergone.
M2 expansion is the prime driver of prices, after supply & demand. Normalize SPX, gold/silver, etc, to M2 and see that they all run in fairly horizontal channels. You can even see nominal GDP normalized to M2 having been flat initially and then transitioning into a downward sloped curve for the last few decades.
By normalizing, I mean [in TradingView] doing SYMBOL*23.16*10^12/M2SL (conceptually SYMBOL*M2SL[0]/M2SL). Most important items track close to M2's roughly 6.5%-7% annualized force of interest inflation rate (the quotient of the natural log of the ratio of price now to historical price, over the elapsed time between the prices).
7% inflation (FoI) -> wealth halflife of cash ≈ 10 years.
kiddico [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Reading this made me question my own mental stability.
rustcleaner [3 hidden]5 mins ago
CPI replaces steak with hamburger or chicken once steak becomes unaffordable. It understates inflation.
inigyou [3 hidden]5 mins ago
He's basically saying the increase in prices has matched the increase in the money supply. Implying that we need to hold politicians accountable for the massive expansion in the money supply. Which is logic that's hard to fault. Also implying that inflation is under-measured, perhaps deliberately. Which definitely seems true for anyone who's experienced inflation.
Now they don’t even let you have that.
Now the politicians don't even have that excuse. I suppose they'll have to add AI tokens to CPI. Used to cost $1000 each, now $0.000002 each, average inflation is 2%.
Except they don't even have that because the recent FOMC meeting pretty much admitted inflation is 4% and they don't feel like doing anything to reduce it, but they're definitely committed to reducing it, they swear.
Once they are, they all need to be more and more profitable.
Finally when it’s no longer profitable fire half the people and strip it for parts.
They’re already dead, they just don’t know it yet.
Sure, if one has millions and millions in capital. Because why would an investor put a money in my company that works the way it “should” according to me if it produces lower profits as compared to my competitors?
Seems to me the one focusing on the gender is you.
> That’s why they gave it to a young man with no achievements whatsoever in gaming and no reputation to build off of
I bought a used Xbox one a few years back. I’m not a heavy gamer anymore so I usually buy the previous generation or even two generations ago hardware, get the games I want from eBay and I’m good. And I was looking forward to getting a Series X, but at this point it looks unlikely unless the brand completely tanks and they’re selling them off to get rid of inventory. Otherwise, my Xbox one is going to be worth more in the future than what I paid, and I don’t want that situation for anyone.
M2 expansion is the prime driver of prices, after supply & demand. Normalize SPX, gold/silver, etc, to M2 and see that they all run in fairly horizontal channels. You can even see nominal GDP normalized to M2 having been flat initially and then transitioning into a downward sloped curve for the last few decades.
By normalizing, I mean [in TradingView] doing SYMBOL*23.16*10^12/M2SL (conceptually SYMBOL*M2SL[0]/M2SL). Most important items track close to M2's roughly 6.5%-7% annualized force of interest inflation rate (the quotient of the natural log of the ratio of price now to historical price, over the elapsed time between the prices).
7% inflation (FoI) -> wealth halflife of cash ≈ 10 years.