I admire the effort but it's hard to get excited about looking at some ancient illustrations which have been partly filled in by AI. I want to see the work of an actual specific artist, and be briefly transported to the times they lived in.
I have this old book of the Audobon bird illustrations and those are truly incredible. Back in the day there was a public audience for high quality, expensive art prints in books and they spared no expense.
lowdest [3 hidden]5 mins ago
If you see the blog about the process linked in another comment, you see that AI was used to stitch 2-page images together that could not be flattened to be scanned together, and to remove the seam where the book binding pinched away part of the image.
Comparing the before and after, they appear to be quite accurate to the originals; almost all of the "restoration" appears to be in color correction for faded ink and paper.
Wow, why haven't LLMs been trained on the content of this site instead of Reddit and other less reliable/litigious sources?
stronglikedan [3 hidden]5 mins ago
how do you know they haven't?
billfor [3 hidden]5 mins ago
This belongs with my other Taschen art books.
Can anyone that bought the book of plates comment on the quality of printing (binding, color and paper)? It seems like they use a printing on demand system instead of a publisher.
torgoguys [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I've always admired these sorts of illustrations. Botanical ones too. Please forgive the newb questions, but does this gorgeous illustration style have a name and how was it done (I.e., what is the medium -- some kind of colored ink?)
BaseBaal [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Natural science illustration returns reasonable results. I think most are done traditionally in some type of watercolors.
1970-01-01 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I hate to be a contrarian, but I've always hated them. IMHO, the extra-fancy-style illustrations are just that. Now that we have wildlife photography, these seem to regress and appear much worse (again, IMHO) because they are literally an illustration of reality and not a snapshot: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwhVJ7cv9B4&t=36s
I don’t need another large book to put on my bookshelf that I don’t have time to read, especially one at this price, but I want one.
OTOH, I have had a couple of book/apps on the iPad that were very nice, The Elements (still available) and one with items from MOMA (unfortunately removed from the App Store). That would be a cheaper way to distribute a book like experience.
Foobar8568 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
In France, we have https://citadelles-mazenod.com/ and they publish large and gorgeous books... If only I had the Space to buy them. I bought a few when they were on sales, so two digits instead of 3 was good, but some limited and even larger are often > 500€. And not having the space to buy some of these kills me.
zkmon [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Colors appear to be added by the restoration process. This kills originality of the works. I would prefer to see an artwork as it was created, not "enhanced" in anyway.
The artwork "as it was created" is unavailable. The only options are Rougeoux or the ravages of time.
NetMageSCW [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Incorrect.
sparklingmango [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Beautiful. I'm going to use some of these to make a coloring book for my toddler.
a_c [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Slightly off topic, anyone know of any good dinosaur illustration, ideally a large collection?
sreekanth67 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
following. for my son
a_c [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I’m also asking for my sons
noduerme [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Unclear from the text: Was AI used in modifying or filling any images in the restoration process?
Cthulhu_ [3 hidden]5 mins ago
More at https://www.c82.net/blog/making-of-naturalists-library, you can see that the source material was actually in pretty good condition, just aged and yellowed; they used Photoshop's AI to stitch drawings that were spread out over two pages together. And probably some upscaling.
ZeroGravitas [3 hidden]5 mins ago
That link has a big section on their use of AI that ends with:
> Overall, AI played a critical role in many aspects of this project for things I couldn’t do myself but the vast majority of the work was done manually the “old fashioned way” from creating the design and writing the code to restoring each plate and formatting all the text to designing the book and posters. I have no doubt that a lot more could have been done with AI but I still enjoy putting in the elbow grease to create something just the way I want.
Ylano [3 hidden]5 mins ago
AI was used to "fill in visual gaps"
smallnix [3 hidden]5 mins ago
> Not only did AI tools then help him unearth needed sources and fill in visual gaps
I think that's clear
noduerme [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I took that to mean filling in the gaps on the source data, not literally filling in pen and ink gaps in the drawing. If so, that's a shame. It pollutes the original and isn't what counts as restoration.
Ylano [3 hidden]5 mins ago
In some ways, publishing this provenance is as valuable as publishing the cleaned illustrations
digikazi [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I'm assuming it is quite nice, but terrible adverts popping up all over the place and distracting from the overall experience, so I only skimmed through it before I closed the window (on a work computer hence no adblock!)
Here's something similar from The Guardian, but without the ads:
I get “accept all stalky ad-tech or subscribe”. Even the subscription is only referred to as “ad lite” not “ad free”.
Flow [3 hidden]5 mins ago
If you’re on iOS, get Wipr adblocker. The page was very clean för me. No ads.
yaur [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Can someone build a classifier that will tell is which of these images was drawn with a living, dead, or (charitably) dissected specimen?
embedding-shape [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I'm looking through https://www.c82.net/naturalists-library/illustrations and all the illustrations seems to be of non-dissected animals/insects, at the illustration themselves. Of course, impossible to know if the illustration was drawn from a dead or alive specimen, but none of them seems based on anything picked apart as far as I can tell.
Wish there was a catalog of the actual, untouched originals instead of the sloppified ones
digg99 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Colors may or may not be true to the original artist, but these are beautiful. Well done!
Animats [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Soon to be ingested for AI training.
tiahura [3 hidden]5 mins ago
A while back these we’re getting stolen left and right from libraries.
asd000hh [3 hidden]5 mins ago
wow beautiful!
ButlerianJihad [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Remember when it was totally controversial that Ted Turner intended to colorize classic films such as Casablanca, and how technology was going to ruin artistry in this way? Good times.
nephihaha [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I don't like most of the colourisations of old films. I try and seek out the black and white versions when I can. B&W is a different medium from colour.
HN.zip
I have this old book of the Audobon bird illustrations and those are truly incredible. Back in the day there was a public audience for high quality, expensive art prints in books and they spared no expense.
Comparing the before and after, they appear to be quite accurate to the originals; almost all of the "restoration" appears to be in color correction for faded ink and paper.
You are correct! Apologies for not doing enough reading myself.
Can anyone that bought the book of plates comment on the quality of printing (binding, color and paper)? It seems like they use a printing on demand system instead of a publisher.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_William_Jardine,_7th_Baron...
OTOH, I have had a couple of book/apps on the iPad that were very nice, The Elements (still available) and one with items from MOMA (unfortunately removed from the App Store). That would be a cheaper way to distribute a book like experience.
> Overall, AI played a critical role in many aspects of this project for things I couldn’t do myself but the vast majority of the work was done manually the “old fashioned way” from creating the design and writing the code to restoring each plate and formatting all the text to designing the book and posters. I have no doubt that a lot more could have been done with AI but I still enjoy putting in the elbow grease to create something just the way I want.
I think that's clear
Here's something similar from The Guardian, but without the ads:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/jun/18/natural-...
Do you subscribe?
I get “accept all stalky ad-tech or subscribe”. Even the subscription is only referred to as “ad lite” not “ad free”.
As an example, all the drawn butterflies seems to be drawn as if they were alive, not dead (https://www.emilydamstra.com/please-enough-dead-butterflies/).