16 MB RAM required, 32 MB RAM recommended... how refreshing! Great work.
ethanpil [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Wow. As a comparison, I just opened a new Google Maps tab in Chrome.
According to the Chrome Task Manager, the tab alone uses 433mb RAM and 34mb GPU memory footprint after first load.
IgorPartola [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Wait but why isn’t it an Electron app? I thought visual apps like this required at least 1-2GB of RAM to run. How can it possibly only need 16MB?! Must be vaporware.
ccamrobertson [3 hidden]5 mins ago
This is really cool, time to dust off an old PowerPC. I've been thinking about building apps for old Mac OS versions for a while with the advent of LLMs, glad to see someone is doing it.
nhubbard [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Would love to see the source code for this and the underlying details like Classic or Carbon, and the libraries mentioned on Tinker Different for TLS, HTTP/2, and Unicode
ktallett [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Great work developing for OS9 still. I had taken started developing in Think C for a few months as a fun side project to work , and it still has some interesting ideas for development. Plenty of communities for this nowadays still.
erickhill [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I'll be trying this out on my 500Mhz Powerbook Pismo running 9.2 tonight!
robot_jesus [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I love stuff like this. Even though I don’t have a machine capable with running OS 9 natively, I’m glad this exists. Looks awesome!
anonymousiam [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I was hoping this article had something to do with Microware OS-9, but it doesn't.
Hmmm. I wonder what the most beefed up OS 9 computer would be... I loved that OS so much.
JeremyHerrman [3 hidden]5 mins ago
My OS 9 battlestation is a G4 tower (Digital Audio) with a Sonnet dual 1.6GHz upgrade, 1.5GB RAM and a nvidia GeForce4 Ti which is one of the best OS 9 graphics cards available.
classichasclass [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Currently my "big" native 9.2.2 system is a MDD G4 with a Sonnet 1.8GHz dual 7447A upgrade, 2GB RAM (1.5GB useable in OS 9) and an ATI Radeon 9000 Pro. I'm sure there's a config more extreme than that out there. It is a pleasure to use even though it's one of the windtunnel systems.
fleeno [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I believe from Apple officially it would be the dual 1.25ghz MDD G4. I had one new, and still have it running today!
timw4mail [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Officially? A single cpu G4 tower. Beyond that, I'm not sure.
Quite a lot. I remember my dad's SE(?) could be upgraded to 128mb ram or some ludicrous figure, compared to my 8mb 486.
Lammy [3 hidden]5 mins ago
>SE(?) could be upgraded to 128mb ram
Probably an SE/30; vastly different internally than the original 68000 SE, more like a MacⅡx wearing a classic Mac shell. Great machine <3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh_SE/30
analogpixel [3 hidden]5 mins ago
The cool thing isn't so much os9map (yes it's cool) , but the fact that the data wasn't locked behind some wall and they were able to do whatever they wanted with it. There are a lot of cool ideas out there that are thwarted because the data is just locked away behind something only a very limited web gui can access, and you are at the mercy of people who's greatest ideas are ways to make the most horrible money extracting experience they can.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OS-9
Probably an SE/30; vastly different internally than the original 68000 SE, more like a MacⅡx wearing a classic Mac shell. Great machine <3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh_SE/30