There's a 7-minute version, with two more verses that aren't in the version you always hear on the radio. The one starting at 3:45 in that video is particularly powerful and chilling.
orly01 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
It doesn't look like the second has been cut off to get the first, because the font is different. It looks like the second was an attempt to extend the first (also, it kills the joke)
petcat [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Steinman was a genius. One of the greatest rock composers of all time and he picked his performers brilliantly.
dreamcompiler [3 hidden]5 mins ago
TIL Bonnie Tyler was the female Meat Loaf.
mikestew [3 hidden]5 mins ago
At the time it was pretty obvious, having just come off Meatloaf’s Bat Out of Hell being played on the radio ten times a day.
That's actually a really interesting visualization of a professionally structured verse.
chasd00 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Not sure why you were downvoted, it is super interesting. I know nothing of songwriting but it seems like that could be read by a singing performer in similarly to how sheet music is read by an instrument performer. In the graph, there's additional information than just the words that a singer would need to perform the song accurately.
/re-iterate i know almost nothing of music except what i like which i've been informed over and over is incorrect hah.
lolive [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Visual representation is your WORST friend: it will make things LOOK simple even if the real thing required the utter mastery to create.
I once worked with a guy mixing TV programmes and live DVDs; I knew he’d been a studio engineer at one point in his career. We were re-arranging our studios one day and as I picked up a pair of NS-10s he casually said “I mixed ‘Total Eclipse of the Heart’ on those…”
That is so great. My wife and i love to annoy our teenage kids by getting Alexa to play this song and then singing along very dramatically haha.
embedding-shape [3 hidden]5 mins ago
How old are you, for curiosities sake? I'm born early 90s, fondly remembering me and a friend shaming all the rest of our group by singing this song (dramatically as well) as a duet whenever we were in (already loud) public spaces.
chasd00 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I'm 50, i have two boys ages 16 and 14. My wife was more into music than I was growing up (i grew up in rural areas, she grew up in the city). One of my favorite stories she has is helping Modest Mouse unload their van when playing in Dallas at Club Dada (small local venue) back in the 90s. She also has so many cool rave, hiphop, and sxsw stories from that era since she went to HS in Arlington TX (class of '95), UT for college, and then lived in NYC for a while dating a musician. Austin in the mid/late 90s was a very special place to be a young person.
petercooper [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Back in 1999, the UK had its first total solar eclipse for several decades and VH1 played the music video (though, not this one ;-)) on loop for an hour while it was happening.
nostrademons [3 hidden]5 mins ago
If you like meta-songs, you may be interested in "Title of this song" by Da Vinci's Notebook:
I had never seen the music video until the news started playing it. Super funny
pchristensen [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I came here to post this, glad you beat me to it. I pulled a muscle laughing the first time I saw this.
imzadi [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Sony tried so hard to kill this when it was new
CamperBob2 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I'm glad this is still on the Internet. It's exactly the sort of thing that almost never is, when I try to find it again several years after seeing it the first time.
funnybeam [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I like to pretend that was filmed in the Hogwarts sixth form commmon room in the eighties
I went to the Reading Rock Festival back in the 80s. she was viewed very much as middle of the road and when she came on, got roundly booed and many bottles of nefarious liquids were tossed at her and the band.
she and they were total pros, shrugged it off, she hurled some abuse back and within a couple of songs had the crowd eating out of the palm of her hand.
RIP Bonnie. A class act.
paulirwin [3 hidden]5 mins ago
My two-year-old son had started saying "turn around" in a sing-song kind of way several months back, and thus my wife and I, both babies of the 80s, had to start singing the song whenever he would do it. It became a fun thing that my son enjoys more than we do. That turned into regularly playing this song (and its covers) in the living room. We just did this again a few nights ago because he loves the song so much and requests it now.
RIP Bonnie.
urbsgpw [3 hidden]5 mins ago
My mum had a cassette with some of her songs. We'd have it on for long trips. I loved the long version of Faster than the speed of night. it's basically just "carpe diem" in a different format, but i loved her voice and the slight melancholy and almost call to action that the song brought with it. Also, the video (of the shorter version) is peak 80's: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jm4CgwRxw3Y
petcat [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Jim Steinman, Meat Loaf, and now Bonnie Tyler. It truly all has come to an end. I think Celine Dion is the last one still carrying on Steinman's legacy.
gwbas1c [3 hidden]5 mins ago
This broke my heart:
> Despite coming from a big, musical family, Tyler and Sullivan never had children.
> I absolutely adore children.
> I did have a miscarriage when I was 40, I left it too late, you know?
I feel like, if you get into that situation, try to adopt or become a foster parent.
auto [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Just as good a time as ever to post one of my favorite classic deep YouTube video's, Hurra Torpedo's cover of Total Eclipse of the Heart.
Absolute classic. If anyone is interested, the Footloose soundtrack (which has Holding Out For a Hero on it) is probably one of the greatest soundtracks of all time. The movie sucks but damn, this soundtrack is incredible.
I'm curious now when this was announced. Yesterday, out of nowhere, TikTok showed me a video about someone praising "Total Eclipse of the Heart", despite not having this bubble in my profile. Kinda spooky to see the news now.
derwiki [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Probably one of those coincidences, like you talked about bouncy houses and now you’re seeing ads for bouncy houses
deadbabe [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Too soon, she could have had a lot more life left to live these days, but a bad surgery ended it. Sucks. Try to avoid needing surgery as much as you can.
Edit: guys, I get that it's not a "substantive comment" but there's no excuse for 3 downvotes. Get a life
avazhi [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Nor is this a post that should be on HN, but here we are.
JodieBenitez [3 hidden]5 mins ago
There, got my upvote.
throw7 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
This isn't hacker news... but whatever i guess.
cramer4next [3 hidden]5 mins ago
How is this hacker news worthy? Never heard of her or the song. Is from a time when people carried boomboxes on their shoulders?
nostrademons [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Before that. Her breakthrough album was 1977 and Total Eclipse of the Heart came out in 1982, so it was more the 8-track era. It remained a staple of radio plays (remember those?) through the 80s and 90s though, and was remade by Nikki French into a chart-topping dance version in 1995.
A lot of HN is folks in their late 30s, 40s, and early 50s (and sometimes even older!), so many folks here would've overlapped with the radio era. A lot of folks here were involved in making YouTube/Instagram/TikTok, not listening to it.
masfuerte [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I'm old enough to remember Walkmans coming out in 1979, which was the start of the end of the boombox era. Approximately no-one was using 8-track at that point.
runako [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I'm not quite that old, but didn't people look down on cassettes due to their lower audio quality? Weren't most home systems (hi-fis) still vinyl or 8-track for a while longer?
MontgomeryPy [3 hidden]5 mins ago
A big driver of cassettes then was the write ability, unlike 8 tracks. You could borrow your friend's new vinyl album, pop in a new cassette tape on your hi-fi, and record a copy of the album to the tape. Of course the Walkman then made listening to your new album fully portable.
mikestew [3 hidden]5 mins ago
No one used 8-track for the quality. It was portable, and it would play continuously (it looped), great for sitting with your honey in a secluded area. And the physical quality of 8-tracks weren’t great. Based on the number of 8-track cartridges I saw on the side of the road while out running, the tape would apparently come loose from the cartridge and render it unusable.
By 1980, 8-tracks were relics being displaced by cassette.
bluGill [3 hidden]5 mins ago
They did. However vinyl was considered better than 8 track. Cassette was a lot more portable than 8 track, and so where portability mattered it won. Elsewhere vinyl was considered better than 8 track and so it won (a few years latter CDs came and won).
Those who really cared about sound quality had reel to reel tape, but that was very rare. Almost no albums were ever released on reel to reel. You typically bought the vinyl and copied it to your own reels thus ensuring there were no scratches.
splatzone [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Nah, occassional non tech stuff is very welcome. It’s interesting to see HN’s perspective on other things
PurpleRamen [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Death notices of famous artists are regularly on HN. If people upvote it, it should be worthy.
krapp [3 hidden]5 mins ago
That's not how it works. If upvotes alone mattered, HN would quickly degenerate into Reddit. The bar is whether "good hackers" would find this interesting.
Death notices of famous artists are the definition of off-topic: "most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic." If normies care about it, good hackers by definition probably don't.
I flag this and every such thread I come across. If Hacker News is going to be consistent in its espoused principles, this is non-technical content and thus not welcome. If that standard applies to far more substantive stories regardless of the quality of conversation they produce, it must apply here as well.
PurpleRamen [3 hidden]5 mins ago
> If upvotes alone mattered
I did not say upvotes alone matter, but they should be the final say after all other mechanisms.
> The bar is whether "good hackers" would find this interesting.
If this were true, the majority of frontpage-entries would have to be removed.
> "most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities,[..]If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic."
I guess the notable point here is "most" and "probably". The exception seems to be always news which are so important or dramatic that they are still not removed, and leaving the final decision to the upvotes. Which is why there are also regularly political and sometime seven sports entries (once or twice a year).
Despite being called hacker news, reality is not binary and rules should not be handled like that.
krapp [3 hidden]5 mins ago
>but they should be the final say after all other mechanisms
They shouldn't be, and they aren't. The mods make the final decision and they will work against the consensus when they disagree with it. This is a very aggressively curated community.
>If this were true, the majority of frontpage-entries would have to be removed.
Maybe the majority of frontpage entries should be removed. Maybe the "HN is turning into Reddit" people are finally correct. But that is literally what the guidelines say. On topic - "Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity." Off topic - everything else, with the minor exception of "some new and interesting phenomenon" to gratify that intellectual curiosity.
I'm sorry but there is nothing new or interesting about the death of celebrities, and nothing about it to gratify intellectual curiosity. Their lives, maybe, but if someone wasn't worth discussing on Hacker News in life, they shouldn't be worth discussing post mortem.
>The exception seems to be always news which are so important or dramatic that they are still not removed, and leaving the final decision to the upvotes.
The final decision, in that case, is entirely up to the moderators. Threads with plenty of upvotes get flagged and stay flagged all the time.
>Despite being called hacker news, reality is not binary and rules should not be handled like that.
Maybe. But if there are grey areas, this doesn't seem like one of them. I don't see why far more substantive stories so often get flagged for "politics" or being "non-technical" even when they involve a pile of dead bodies, or why we police humor and emotion like signs of cancer, but we get to wallow in the nostalgia of every dead celebrity that comes along.
xnorswap [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I do think HN should have an obit: category and filter them out the main page.
It's one thing to have obits for people who wouldn't be covered by regular news, but "75 year old celebrity dies" is not any kind of new phenomenon.
It generates a decent amount of upvotes and discussion based on name recognition and nostalgia, but every thread is essentially the same, "Oh, that's sad, I liked their work, <personal anecdote of how they were touched by it>.".
budsniffer952 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Nobody forced you to click on the article or jump into the comment section, did they?
mcmcmc [3 hidden]5 mins ago
It took the place of another more relevant story that could’ve been on the front page
toomuchtodo [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Meta: More often than I should have, I have emailed HN and asked "Why can you not extend/build/etc" this? And, as expected, we'd get into a great email discussion about why that would provide a meaningful improvement over the existing experience. This is a forum of builders, makers, and hackers, to their unspoken point. The primitives provided are "good enough," Hacker News is feature complete. To build this on top of HN in a browser extension or mobile app is trivial, and so, I'd say "If you want this, build it and share with us."
> Anything that gratifies intellectual curiosity is on topic for HN! - https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
That doesn't mean it has to gratify your curiosity or mine - no single article can do that for everyone. But it's clear that that's what makes the article on topic.
> One other aspect: the best HN submissions are the ones that are most uncorrelated with anything else that's gotten attention recently - or, as I used to put it, can't be predicted from any existing sequence
There is a "hide" link for threads not of interest, I strongly encourage it's use to optimize your forum participation experience; if this forum is not to your liking, there are others potentially more suited to what you desire.
> I flag this and every such thread I come across. If Hacker News is going to be consistent in its espoused principles, this is non-technical content and thus not welcome. If that standard applies to far more substantive stories regardless of the quality of conversation they produce, it must apply here as well.
Mods can turn off flag capabilities per account, keep this in mind. You won't know if your flags are effective or not.
avazhi [3 hidden]5 mins ago
> Anything that gratifies intellectual curiosity
And no matter your view on the subject, a pop singer dying is not a topic that is capable of gratifying intellectual curiosity. It's about as banal as things get.
krapp [3 hidden]5 mins ago
>Mods can turn off flag capabilities per account, keep this in mind. You won't know if your flags are effective or not.
I'm well aware, but I still do it on principle.
toomuchtodo [3 hidden]5 mins ago
With time and experience comes wisdom. I wish you wisdom.
budsniffer952 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
>The bar is whether "good hackers" would find this interesting.
Who put you in charge of what other people find interesting?
Get over yourself, loser.
krapp [3 hidden]5 mins ago
You seem to be new here, welcome to Hacker News.
Everyone is in charge of what you should find interesting and everyone will make it your problem.
heresie-dabord [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Next total eclipse, 2026-08-12.
Total: Greenland, Iceland, Spain, Northeastern Portugal
Partial: Northern North America, Europe, West Africa
IIRC her best-known song saw a spike in popularity around the 2024 solar eclipse. (I know I played it a few times.)
swader999 [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Every now and then
an article like this is fine.
madcaptenor [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Every now and then HN falls apart
a-french-anon [3 hidden]5 mins ago
It's not even "geek music", to add to your perplexity.
sverhagen [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Maybe it's not.
Guidelines:
> Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, (...) If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic.
elzbardico [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Well, historically, 1983 is:
- 19 Years after the first superscalar CPU, the CDC-6600
- 10 Years after RFC-675, the first TCP version.
- 14 years after the first ARPANET nodes where connected.
- 1 year after Hopfield Networks, paving the way to Boltzman Networks around two years laters, demonstrating how neural networks could learn to solve complex problems.
- The same year Kunihiko Fukushima developed his work on the Neocognitron for visual pattern recognition, a percursor for future work on Convolutional Neural Networks.
- 3 years before first papers on Backpropagation in neural nets.
- First paper on Reinforcement Learning with reward signals (Baron, Sutton and Anderson)
- 3 years after first smalltalk release.
- 2 years after IBM launched the PC.
- 1 year after 3Com launches the first Ethernet board for the PC.
- 1 Year after Sun Microsystems foundation.
- Unix and C 15th anniversary.
- 6 years after the first commercial relational database.
- 11 years after the first vector processor (Cray-1), arguably the great-grandfather of all modern GPUs
- The same year Borland released Turbo Pascal.
- The same year Apple launched Lisa, and one year before the first macintosh.
- 2 years before Intel launched the 80386 cpu.
- 2 years before C++ first commercial release.
Yeah, hardly a relevant year for us to discuss its culture on HN.
tekla [3 hidden]5 mins ago
Very famous singer, multiple very famous songs, 40 yo song topped the carts during the 2024 Eclipse, was pretty much the theme song for a very small indie movie called Shrek 2.
asimovDev [3 hidden]5 mins ago
I think Shrek would be pro open source software and hardware if he knew what it was, so this makes it HN worthy
HN.zip
https://jeannr.tumblr.com/post/165291081/i-made-a-flow-chart...
I believe that's the original source, but it looks cut off. Here's a full version:
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/b1/82/dc/b182dcc291495c013c98...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Svz-W5w2bPM
There's a 7-minute version, with two more verses that aren't in the version you always hear on the radio. The one starting at 3:45 in that video is particularly powerful and chilling.
/re-iterate i know almost nothing of music except what i like which i've been informed over and over is incorrect hah.
Look at that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATbMw6X3T40
(or that: https://www.facebook.com/reel/1500354675104013)
RIP Ms Tyler, you will be missed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgmUgFEFzco&list=RDHgmUgFEFz...
“Haaaand comes out…”
she and they were total pros, shrugged it off, she hurled some abuse back and within a couple of songs had the crowd eating out of the palm of her hand.
RIP Bonnie. A class act.
RIP Bonnie.
> Despite coming from a big, musical family, Tyler and Sullivan never had children.
> I absolutely adore children.
> I did have a miscarriage when I was 40, I left it too late, you know?
I feel like, if you get into that situation, try to adopt or become a foster parent.
Slightly NSFW, some plumber's crack:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysUjYAi0WcQ
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Steinman
I still want to see the dream realized on Broadway of a Native-American inspired musical.
https://youtu.be/FfUU1wJKXDc
https://jimsteinman.com/charts.htm
Bonnie Tyler's Holding Out for a Hero. This list goes on. The guy was a prolific rock composer genius.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWcASV2sey0
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Footloose_(1984_soundtrack)
"Suuuuure. Kidnap the humans, DESTROY THE MACHINE."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTdHPAY7rOE
We might need a white night on a fiery steed. One can dream.
I'm curious now when this was announced. Yesterday, out of nowhere, TikTok showed me a video about someone praising "Total Eclipse of the Heart", despite not having this bubble in my profile. Kinda spooky to see the news now.
Edit: guys, I get that it's not a "substantive comment" but there's no excuse for 3 downvotes. Get a life
A lot of HN is folks in their late 30s, 40s, and early 50s (and sometimes even older!), so many folks here would've overlapped with the radio era. A lot of folks here were involved in making YouTube/Instagram/TikTok, not listening to it.
By 1980, 8-tracks were relics being displaced by cassette.
Those who really cared about sound quality had reel to reel tape, but that was very rare. Almost no albums were ever released on reel to reel. You typically bought the vinyl and copied it to your own reels thus ensuring there were no scratches.
Death notices of famous artists are the definition of off-topic: "most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic." If normies care about it, good hackers by definition probably don't.
I flag this and every such thread I come across. If Hacker News is going to be consistent in its espoused principles, this is non-technical content and thus not welcome. If that standard applies to far more substantive stories regardless of the quality of conversation they produce, it must apply here as well.
I did not say upvotes alone matter, but they should be the final say after all other mechanisms.
> The bar is whether "good hackers" would find this interesting.
If this were true, the majority of frontpage-entries would have to be removed.
> "most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities,[..]If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic."
I guess the notable point here is "most" and "probably". The exception seems to be always news which are so important or dramatic that they are still not removed, and leaving the final decision to the upvotes. Which is why there are also regularly political and sometime seven sports entries (once or twice a year).
Despite being called hacker news, reality is not binary and rules should not be handled like that.
They shouldn't be, and they aren't. The mods make the final decision and they will work against the consensus when they disagree with it. This is a very aggressively curated community.
>If this were true, the majority of frontpage-entries would have to be removed.
Maybe the majority of frontpage entries should be removed. Maybe the "HN is turning into Reddit" people are finally correct. But that is literally what the guidelines say. On topic - "Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity." Off topic - everything else, with the minor exception of "some new and interesting phenomenon" to gratify that intellectual curiosity.
I'm sorry but there is nothing new or interesting about the death of celebrities, and nothing about it to gratify intellectual curiosity. Their lives, maybe, but if someone wasn't worth discussing on Hacker News in life, they shouldn't be worth discussing post mortem.
>The exception seems to be always news which are so important or dramatic that they are still not removed, and leaving the final decision to the upvotes.
The final decision, in that case, is entirely up to the moderators. Threads with plenty of upvotes get flagged and stay flagged all the time.
>Despite being called hacker news, reality is not binary and rules should not be handled like that.
Maybe. But if there are grey areas, this doesn't seem like one of them. I don't see why far more substantive stories so often get flagged for "politics" or being "non-technical" even when they involve a pile of dead bodies, or why we police humor and emotion like signs of cancer, but we get to wallow in the nostalgia of every dead celebrity that comes along.
It's one thing to have obits for people who wouldn't be covered by regular news, but "75 year old celebrity dies" is not any kind of new phenomenon.
It generates a decent amount of upvotes and discussion based on name recognition and nostalgia, but every thread is essentially the same, "Oh, that's sad, I liked their work, <personal anecdote of how they were touched by it>.".
Ask HN: Any good replacements for "Refined Hacker News?" - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48845676 is an opportunity, for example. Show HN awaits for whatever you build.
> Anything that gratifies intellectual curiosity is on topic for HN! - https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html That doesn't mean it has to gratify your curiosity or mine - no single article can do that for everyone. But it's clear that that's what makes the article on topic.
> One other aspect: the best HN submissions are the ones that are most uncorrelated with anything else that's gotten attention recently - or, as I used to put it, can't be predicted from any existing sequence
There is a "hide" link for threads not of interest, I strongly encourage it's use to optimize your forum participation experience; if this forum is not to your liking, there are others potentially more suited to what you desire.
> I flag this and every such thread I come across. If Hacker News is going to be consistent in its espoused principles, this is non-technical content and thus not welcome. If that standard applies to far more substantive stories regardless of the quality of conversation they produce, it must apply here as well.
Mods can turn off flag capabilities per account, keep this in mind. You won't know if your flags are effective or not.
And no matter your view on the subject, a pop singer dying is not a topic that is capable of gratifying intellectual curiosity. It's about as banal as things get.
I'm well aware, but I still do it on principle.
Who put you in charge of what other people find interesting?
Get over yourself, loser.
Everyone is in charge of what you should find interesting and everyone will make it your problem.
Total: Greenland, Iceland, Spain, Northeastern Portugal
Partial: Northern North America, Europe, West Africa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_solar_eclipses_in_the_...
Guidelines:
> Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, (...) If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic.
- 19 Years after the first superscalar CPU, the CDC-6600
- 10 Years after RFC-675, the first TCP version.
- 14 years after the first ARPANET nodes where connected.
- 1 year after Hopfield Networks, paving the way to Boltzman Networks around two years laters, demonstrating how neural networks could learn to solve complex problems.
- The same year Kunihiko Fukushima developed his work on the Neocognitron for visual pattern recognition, a percursor for future work on Convolutional Neural Networks.
- 3 years before first papers on Backpropagation in neural nets.
- First paper on Reinforcement Learning with reward signals (Baron, Sutton and Anderson)
- 3 years after first smalltalk release.
- 2 years after IBM launched the PC.
- 1 year after 3Com launches the first Ethernet board for the PC.
- 1 Year after Sun Microsystems foundation.
- Unix and C 15th anniversary.
- 6 years after the first commercial relational database.
- 11 years after the first vector processor (Cray-1), arguably the great-grandfather of all modern GPUs
- The same year Borland released Turbo Pascal.
- The same year Apple launched Lisa, and one year before the first macintosh.
- 2 years before Intel launched the 80386 cpu.
- 2 years before C++ first commercial release.
Yeah, hardly a relevant year for us to discuss its culture on HN.